9:34 O you who have believed, indeed many of the scholars and the monks devour the wealth of people unjustly and avert [them] from the way of Allah.
And those who hoard gold and silver and spend it not in the way of Allah – give them tidings of a painful punishment.
35 The Day when it will be heated in the fire of Hell and seared therewith will be their foreheads, their flanks, and their backs, [it will be said], “This is what you hoarded for yourselves, so taste what you used to hoard.”
Koran 9:34-35
Muhammad, ad nauseam: “who have believed”. Read, O you who have believed.
Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.
Note that Muhammad is unable to refute the monks and scholars:
…many of the scholars and the monks… avert [them] from the way of [Islam]
Koran 9:34-35
If Muhammad was in touch with an omniscient god, it would be trivial to expose the ways that the scholars and monks “avert” if they did. But instead, Muhammad is forced to rant in private and command his Muslim bandits, the only power of Islam, to attack these scholars and monks in order to steal their money and torture them. This is a fallacy, that these scholars and monks would easily point out as well, appeal to force, instead of reasoned discourse and debate, to determine the truth of a matter.
And why do the scholars and monks who do not follow Islam need to spend their money on Muhammad Allah? This is simply Muhammad declaring war, robbery and banditry upon anyone who might have money to steal. As such, the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.
Koran Contradiction 