Indeed, Allah loves those who fight in His cause in a row as though they are a [single] structure joined firmly.
Koran 61:4
So much for the religion of peace.
But, Infidel, it’s defensive warfare! Sure, sure, 50+ Islamic nations all defensively acquired when Muhammad lived in Petra, Jordan, or Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
But worse, this verse is about a local event to Muhammad:
Allah stated what He likes, and they were tested on the day of Uhud. However, they retreated and fled, leaving the Prophet behind. It was about their case that Allah revealed this Ayah:
Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 61:1
Obviously, a verse that refers to Muhammad and a battle (Uhud) locks Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran to his time and place, his context, thus showing that Allah is Muhammad and Muhammad is Allah. So Allah, Muhammad, Islam and the Koran are false.
Worse, it’s also bad advice to his Muslim soldiers, and only suited for medieval-era wars, where Muhammad’s Muslim soldiers are armed with swords and spears. For example, here are the top 10 tactics for ancient and medieval battles:
Notice that Muhammad and Allah together have fewer and worse tactics than this essentially random YouTube video on the topic. Muhammad and Allah were unable to explain this battle clearly and coherently, which was really good historically for the opponents of Islam, as they would be able to defeat Islamic armies that didn’t know tactics.
For more about this battle, see Battle of Uhud.
As you can see, YouTube and I give better advice than Muhammad, Jibril and Allah for Muslims planning medieval battles. Obviously, we (note the lower case “we”) are superior, and we don’t demand zakat.
The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.

[…] Qur’an 61:4 […]
LikeLike