Koran 54:23-32

54:23 Thamūd denied the warning.

24 And said, “Is it one human being among us that we should follow? Indeed, we would then be in error and madness. 25 Has the message been sent down upon him from among us? Rather, he is an insolent liar.”

26 They will know tomorrow who is the insolent liar.

27 Indeed, We are sending the she-camel as trial for them, so watch them and be patient.

28 And inform them that the water is shared between them, each [day of] drink attended [by turn].

29 But they called their companion, and he dared and hamstrung [her].

30 And how [severe] were My punishment and warning.

31 Indeed, We sent upon them one shriek [i.e., blast from the sky], and they became like the dry twig fragments of an [animal] pen.

32 And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:23-32

Another corrupt repetition with a corrupt variation of the story of Saleh. Obviously, corrupt repetitions with corrupt variations are incoherent with the notion that Allah is one, but are coherent with a madman ranting in anger.

Notice that verse 32 is a corrupt repetition of verses 22 and 17 from the previous passages:

And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:32

And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:22

And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:17

Obviously this is done for rhyming purposes to make a better song, without regard to the message that Allah is one, not three repeats.

So I’ll just repeat my criticism from the previous passage:

Muhammad claims the “Quran” is “easy for remembrance”, yet had multiple problems with himself forgetting Koran, other people getting it wrong, many versions circulating around, and worse, it’s in Classica Arabic, and has to be sung. Thus this shows all written Korans are false, as they do not show how to correctly sing the Koran. And of course, a sung Koran, in Classical Arabic, is local to Muhammad and friends, so showing Allah, Islam and Koran are local to Muhammad, which means they’re all false.

And if the “Quran” is “easy for remembrance” then what’s the point of a written Koran? Particularly when reading Muhammad’s Koran repeatedly shows that Muhammad was a false prophet, for a false god, Allah, for a false religion, Islam, without even a false book, Koran.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.