Koran 54:9-17

54:9 The people of Noah denied before them, and they denied Our servant and said, “A madman,” and he was repelled.

10 So he invoked his Lord, “Indeed, I am overpowered, so help.”

11 Then We opened the gates of the heaven with rain pouring down

12 And caused the earth to burst with springs, and the waters met for a matter already predestined.

13 And We carried him on a [construction of] planks and nails,

14 Sailing under Our observation as reward for he who had been denied.

15 And We left it as a sign, so is there any who will remember?

16 And how [severe] were My punishment and warning.

17 And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:9-17

Muhammad, in his Koran, addresses a sentence, verse, or passage to “Anonymous They”, with “they”, “them”, “he”, “your”, “the people”, and so on, without naming them. For more, read Anonymous They.

Muhammad includes the imperfect words of imperfect others, an interlocutor who is only in Muhammad’s mind, instead of the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. This means that Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, is not from Allah, which means Allah, Muhammad, Islamic doctrine, Islam, and Koran are incoherent and false.

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

This is another corrupt repetition of the story of Noah, with Muhammad interleaving his experiences with the Quraysh, the Nabateans, inside the story. The bit that comes from Muhammad? This:

54:9 The people of Noah denied before them, and they denied Our servant and said, “A madman,” and he was repelled.

10 So he invoked his Lord, “Indeed, I am overpowered, so help.”

Koran 54:9-10

Note that Muhammad is unable to correctly translate the name of Noah’s Ark: “a [construction of] planks and nails”. Note how the translators have to help out Muhammad, to make this seem divine, when it’s clearly the words of a mere human, who can’t remember correctly, mixes in his own experiences and doesn’t know the right names. Clearly, Allah is Muhammad, Muhammad is Allah, and so Islam and the Koran are false.

Muhammad forgets, again, that Noah took the animals on board. Nothing about that here, showing Muhammad’s story is corrupt, and so not from any real god.

Muhammad claims: “And We left it as a sign”. What sign? No one has found Noah’s Ark.

Notice the switch from “We” back to “My” then back to “We”, in the passage. How many are Allah again? One for “My”, two or more for “We”.

Muhammad claims the “Quran” is “easy for remembrance”, yet had multiple problems with himself forgetting the Koran, other people getting it wrong, many versions circulating around, and worse, it’s in Classical Arabic, and has to be sung. Thus, this shows all written Korans are false, as they do not show how to correctly sing the Koran. And of course, a sung Koran, in Classical Arabic, is local to Muhammad and friends, so showing Allah, Islam, and the Koran are local to Muhammad, which means they’re all false.

And if the “Quran” is “easy for remembrance”, then what’s the point of a written Koran? Particularly when reading Muhammad’s Koran repeatedly shows that Muhammad was a false prophet, for a false god, Allah, for a false religion, Islam, without even a false book, the Koran.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.