Koran 44:1-8

44:1 Ḥā, Meem.

2 By the clear Book, 3 Indeed, We sent it down during a blessed night.

Indeed, We were to warn [mankind].

4 Therein [i.e., on that night] is made distinct every precise matter – 5 [Every] matter [proceeding] from Us.

Indeed, We were to send [a messenger] 6 As mercy from your Lord.

Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Knowing, 7 Lord of the heavens and the earth and that between them, if you would be certain.

8 There is no deity except Him; He gives life and causes death.

[He is] your Lord and the Lord of your first forefathers.

Koran 44:1-8

Koran 44:1

Ḥā, Meem.

Koran 44:1

These are the “Muqatta’at” or “Mysterious Letters”. They shouldn’t be in Muhammad’s Koran. For more, read Mysterious Letters?

Koran 44:2

44:2 By the clear Book,

Koran 44:2

Verse 2, Muhammad swears by the “clear Book”.

But, Infidel, it’s Allah that swears! A god swearing by Muhammad’s Koran, the Hafs version, artistically made by this calligrapher, Uthman Taha, and printed in Saudi Arabia?

But, Infidel, it’s Allah swearing by the Slate in Heaven with Allah! It’s nice you cleared that up, better than the translators: “By the clear Book” and better than the scholars in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 44:1, do:

By the manifest Book that makes things clear.

Koran 44:2, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 44:1

Notice the scholars have “manifest”. What does “manifest” mean?

readily perceived by the eye or the understanding; evident; obvious; apparent; plain: a manifest error.

Manifest, Dictionary.com

Let’s recall that Muhammad’s Koran was not made manifest until after his death by several Muslim men.

Narrated Anas:

Uthman called Zaid bin Thabit, Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and AbdurRahman bin Al-Harith bin Hisham, and then they wrote the manuscripts of the Holy Qur’an in the form of book in several copies.

Uthman said to the three Quraishi persons. “If you differ with Zaid bin Thabit on any point of the Qur’an, then write it in the language of Quraish, as the Qur’an was revealed in their language.”

So they acted accordingly. (Zaid bin Thabit was an Ansari and not from Quraish).

Sahih al-Bukhari 3506

For more, see: A Koran Like it?

But, Infidel, you’re not fooling me with your corrupt English dictionary, “a manifest error”! I don’t know what you mean. Be sure to check that’s all in the definition.

Let’s check Quran Corpus – Translations:

By the clear Book,

Sahih International

By the Scripture that maketh plain

Pickthall

By the Book that makes things clear;-

Yusuf Ali

I swear by the Book that makes manifest (the truth).

Shakir

I swear by the illustrious Book.

Muhammad Sarwar

By the manifest Book (this Quran) that makes things clear,

Mohsin Khan

By the Clear Book.

Arberry

Notice that two of the translations make it very obvious that it’s Muhammad that swears with “I swear”.

But, Infidel, it’s Allah, as “I”, who swears! How can that be, when it’s Muhammad that’s standing there, reciting (singing) “I [Muhammad] swear”? After all, it’s not Muhammad incarnating Allah, as an alternative personality, right?

“I [Allah] swear” – Muhammad stands there while the Quraysh, the Nabateans, laugh at him. Now you can understand why Muhammad preferred ranting to his secretary, instead. A far more sympathetic ear.

Now you know that it’s wrong for a god to swear, and when Muhammad swears, it shows Muhammad is the reciter, singer, and creator of Muhammad’s Koran. Muhammad’s boasting, his “need” to swear, to pretend that he’s telling the truth, when he’s actually lying, betrays him.

But, Infidel, it’s your translations that get this wrong! Feel free to do better than the Muslim expert translators above. Here’s the Arabic with the English for you:

wal-kitābi

By the Book

l-mubīni

the clear,

Koran 44:2, Corpus Quran, Word by Word

But, Infidel, there’s no “I” there! That’s what the Muslim translators Shakir and Muhammad Sarwar have in their translations. Remember the situation, Muhammad is standing there, singing: “wal-kitābi”, “By the Book”, “l-mubīni”, “the clear”. Obviously Muhammad is swearing, “By the Book,” which doesn’t exist, which is “the clear” and obviously, it’s Muhammad that is swearing and so demonstrating that these words are NOT the words of Allah. Essentially Muhammad is swearing by his own words and making himself a fool.

Let’s confirm this again, imagine you are there with Muhammad:

Perhaps you imagine yourself, like this?

Where is the manifest book? This is a manifest book, made very clear:

This is a manifest Koran in Arabic script:

But, Infidel, it’s in my mind – I memorised it! This is now, that was then.

Thus you know, that Muhammad was the false prophet, for the false god, Allah, for the false religion, Islam, without even the false book, Koran.

But, Infidel, this is just technicalities and Muhammad was prophesying [or some other excuse]! Then let’s move onto the next verse:

Koran 44:3

2 By the clear Book, 3 Indeed, We sent it down during a blessed night.

Indeed, We were to warn [mankind].

Koran 44:2-3

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

I wonder where this clear Book is?

Where is the rest of the “We” here?

But, Infidel, that’s Allah,… speaking,… Mmmm, I agree with you. You know it’s supposed to be Jibril who speaks to Muhammad, right?

Allah, using the royal “We” to make himself seem grand, divine, GOD-LIKE, inside Muhammad’s merely human body.

Or was it Jibril, using the the royal “We” to make himself seem grand, infernal, DEMON-LIKE, inside Muhammad’s merely human body?

What a rush!

Carrying on: “sent it down during a blessed night.” Still can’t see it.

So where’s that Slate, at night?

Carrying on: “Indeed, We were to warn [mankind].” Who? “[mankind]” – Thank you, Sahih International translators, you’re very helpful in showing Muhammad’s frailty. Did Muhammad actually get out of Saudi Arabia to warn all mankind? As far as I know, no.

But, Infidel, Buraq! In reality, not in dreams.

Do you think the people in Port Sudan know about this crazy madman reciting (singing) to his secretary? Probably not.

But, Infidel, I thought you were of the opinion that Mecca is Petra, Jordan?! This only makes the problem harder for Muhammad and still makes Muhammad a failure.

So if not to all “[mankind]”, then obviously Muhammad was not a warner to all “[mankind]”, thus Muhammad’s warning is local, as it was, thus showing Allah is local, which means Allah, Islam, Koran and Muhammad are all false.

Koran 44:4-8

44:4 Therein [i.e., on that night] is made distinct every precise matter – 5 [Every] matter [proceeding] from Us.

Indeed, We were to send [a messenger] 6 As mercy from your Lord.

Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Knowing, 7 Lord of the heavens and the earth and that between them, if you would be certain.

8 There is no deity except Him; He gives life and causes death.

[He is] your Lord and the Lord of your first forefathers.

Koran 44:1-8

Muhammad lied: “Therein [i.e., on that night] is made distinct every precise matter”. Yet, Muhammad is unable to show this, this event in the past, to his listeners in his present or to his readers in the future.

Muhammad lied: “[Every] matter [proceeding] from Us.” Nothing precedes from “Us” or Allah, or Allah and Muhammad, or Muhammad and Jibril, or Jibril. All Muhammad has is his own words, in classical Arabic, which a scribe is writing down, as he says, “Us”.

But, Infidel, you can’t say that! Muhammad fails to demonstrate anything coming from Allah, thus we can confidently assert that nothing comes from Allah, the stone idol.

Muhammad lied: “Indeed, We were to send [a messenger] 6 As mercy from your Lord.” Muhammad is the only “messenger” and “your Lord” is a stone idol, called Allah:

And why is this in the past, with respect to Muhammad? Has Muhammad suddenly demoted himself yet again to not even being a messenger? Or is this Jibril referring to Muhammad in the third person?

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Muhammad lied: “[to Allah] belongs”, “Allah created”, “Allah knows”, “dominion”, “Lord over” or “Lord of” “the heavens and the earth”. Obviously, Allah doesn’t create, own, know, have, or have dominion over the heavens and the earth, because our Earth is IN the universe and is always a part of the universe, not separate from the “heavens”. These phrases show that Muhammad was describing what was above, “heavens” and what was below, “earth”, which is a Flat Earth worldview. Thus, Allah is imaginary, fictional, and false, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Muhammad lied: “There is no deity except Him; He gives life and causes death.” Allah never causes life and never causes death. For more, see: What are we?

Muhammad, in his Koran, addresses a sentence, verse, or passage to “Anonymous They”, with “they”, “them”, “he”, “your”, “the people”, and so on, without naming them. For more, read Anonymous They.

With his last sentence in his passage, Muhammad admits to the truth, that: “[He is] your Lord and the Lord of your first forefathers.” showing that the Quraysh god Allah is the same god as Muhammad’s god, and because all the rest of Allah’s family is idols:

We know that Allah himself is an idol:

Allah is not the Lord of anything, Allah doesn’t know anything, and is informed by Muhammad’s memory, so showing that Allah is Muhammad:

Thus, Allah is Muhammad, Muhammad is Allah, so Islam and Koran are false.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.