Koran 43:46-56

43:46 And certainly did We send Moses with Our signs to Pharaoh and his establishment, and he said, “Indeed, I am the messenger of the Lord of the worlds.”

47 But when he brought them Our signs, at once they laughed at them.

48 And We showed them not a sign except that it was greater than its sister, and We seized them with affliction that perhaps they might return [to faith].

49 And they said [to Moses], “O magician, invoke for us your Lord by what He has promised you. Indeed, we will be guided.”

50 But when We removed from them the affliction, at once they broke their word.

51 And Pharaoh called out among his people; he said, “O my people, does not the kingdom of Egypt belong to me, and these rivers flowing beneath me; then do you not see? 52 Or am I [not] better than this one [i.e., Moses] who is insignificant and hardly makes himself clear? 53 Then why have there not been placed upon him bracelets of gold or come with him the angels in conjunction?”

54 So he bluffed his people, and they obeyed him. Indeed, they were [themselves] a people defiantly disobedient [of Allah].

55 And when they angered Us, We took retribution from them and drowned them all.

56 And We made them a precedent and an example for the later peoples.

Koran 43:46-56

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Muhammad includes the imperfect words of imperfect others, an interlocutor who is only in Muhammad’s mind, instead of the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. This means that Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, is not from Allah, which means Allah, Muhammad, Islamic doctrine, Islam, and Koran are incoherent and false.

Muhammad mixes up the story of Moses with his own experiences, making “Pharaoh” the leader of the Quraysh, the Nabateans, and making the “Egyptians”, the Quraysh, the Nabateans, too. For more about the repeated and corrupted stories of Moses in Muhammad’s Koran, see: Story of Moses.

According to the story of Moses in the Torah and the Bible, Moses never called himself “the messenger of the Lord of the worlds.” That’s Muhammad’s words forced into the mouth of Moses. In verse 47, Muhammad shows that he’s playing as Moses, with: “when he brought them Our signs, at once they laughed at them.” The “signs” here are Muhammad’s verses, obvious meta-references, nonsense, drivel and lies. Of course, the Quraysh, the Nabateans, laughed at him.

Muhammad continues his ranting with: “We showed them not a sign except that it was greater than its sister,” – in other words, Muhammad kept ranting and then lies: “We seized them with affliction that perhaps they might return [to faith].” Nothing happened. Perhaps this is where Muhammad is thinking of his shunning here, the “affliction” being the shunning of Muhammad by the Quraysh, the Nabateans.

Notice how the Quraysh, the Nabateans, ask for proof, with: “O magician, invoke for us your Lord by what He has promised you. Indeed, we will be guided.” Muhammad is unable to do this, as Allah is an idol, as the Quraysh, the Nabateans, already knew.

In verse 51, “Pharaoh”, is the leader of the “Egyptians”, the Quraysh, the Nabateans, makes a grand speech, which to Muhammad is very memorable, and so Muhammad carefully records it, along with the speech of the Quraysh, the Nabateans, earlier, thus showing that Muhammad’s Koran, his singing, his recitation comes from Muhammad (and friends) not from Allah. Notice the phrase: “these rivers flowing beneath me”. In Egypt, there’s only one river, the Nile. Why would “Pharaoh” use a plural? Unless “Pharaoh” really is the leader of the Quraysh, the Nabateans, in Petra, Jordan, where several rivers flow:

Notice all the wadis in the area. Compare with Mecca in Saudi Arabia with no rivers:

And from space, again, no rivers:

Thus, you know that “Pharaoh” here is the leader of the Quraysh, the Nabateans, and the location is “Mecca”, Petra, Jordan.

Let’s continue with Pharaoh’s speech. His demands are quite reasonable. Muhammad should prove he’s really speaking for Allah, as he’s “insignificant” and “hardly makes himself clear”, and Muhammad could easily have “bracelets of gold” or have “the angels in conjunction” with him. Recall that according to Muhammad, we all have an angel on each shoulder:

Muhammad earlier claims that there’s an angel of death:

Muhammad claims that the angels on our shoulders are writing our deeds down, for us to read later. Why not produce that for everyone? Or why not produce a printed Koran for everyone? Surely a divine photocopier is not that hard for Allah to make?

After all, isn’t it Allah that makes forests of trees, that make paper?

Or simply make a prophecy that is true? Muhammad completely fails at this, repeatedly.

Muhammad is unable to do any of these, showing that Allah, Islam and the Koran are false. Then he goes into his revenge fantasy, pretending that the Quraysh, the Nabateans, will be drowned like Pharaoh’s army. Perhaps the season was winter, and the wadis were running high with the rains?

Muhammad gets the story of Moses really wrong, in yet another vain repetition with corrupt additions, showing it’s really about himself and the Quraysh, the Nabateans. As such, he utterly fails to be a good representative of Allah, Allah is of no help, and only “We” is there expressing Muhammad’s anger at his own failure, all showing that Muhammad’s singing, Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran come from Muhammad (and friends).

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.