Koran 17:9-10

17:9 Indeed, this Qur’an guides to that which is most suitable and gives good tidings to the believers who do righteous deeds that they will have a great reward.

10 And that those who do not believe in the Hereafter – We have prepared for them a painful punishment.

Koran 17:9-10

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Notice the incoherence in this passage, first: “the believers” and then: “those who do not believe in the Hereafter” – so believers are meant to believe in the “Hereafter” and thus assign a partner to Allah? Obviously, this is shirk, a sin in Islam, and is incoherent. And if we substitute the better phrase:

And that those who do not believe in Allah – We have prepared for them a painful punishment.

A better Koran 17:10

How can “We” refer to the oneness of Allah? What follows the “We” is an appeal to force fallacy, unworthy of a real god, indicating the passage is from a false prophet, Muhammad. Here’s a better version:

And that those who do not believe in me – I will make a painful punishment.

Allah says a better Koran 17:10

How can a mere human like myself obviously exceed Allah and Muhammad? And worse, this actually reveals that Allah is Muhammad and a liar.

This passage is merely false promises to the believers – they’re still dead in the ground and haven’t received their reward, and false threats to the disbelievers who aren’t there to listen to Muhammad.

Worse, how can this “Qur’an” guide, when there are over 90 more chapters to be recited? And far worse, how can a mere recitation guide, when it’s not recited to all people of the past, present and future, and not in their native language?

Consider the picture at the top of the page, “Love” in English and the same in several other languages, and it’s a picture of a cartoon heart. Obviously, it’s a creation of humans, yet it’s greater than what Allah has supposedly created as an oral-only recitation. Translations of the Koran are obviously better than the “Qur’an”, as I show.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.