Koran 17:2-3

17:2 And We gave Moses the Scripture and made it a guidance for the Children of Israel that you not take other than Me as Disposer of affairs, 3 O descendants of those We carried [in the ship] with Noah.

Indeed, he was a grateful servant.

Koran 17:2-3

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Note that “Disposer of affairs” is not in the Bible. Obviously, a sign of corruption, right? Instead, the Bible and Torah only have GOD as being one, with no need to talk about “associates” or “Disposer of affairs”. This is an obvious sign of corruption because a book about one god doesn’t need to mention other gods:

53:19 So have you considered al-Lat and al-‘Uzza? 20 And Manat, the third – the other one?

Koran 53:19-20

Also, notice that Muhammad omits to mention the animals saved by Noah. That’s because Muhammad subconsciously realised that Allah doesn’t control animals, and thus is false.

And note that Muhammad didn’t mention anything about “Scripture” being given to Noah.

Interestingly, the Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 17:2 has most of these two verses as sayings by Muhammad instead:

2 And We gave Musa the Scripture and made it a guidance for the Children of Israel (saying): “Take none other than Me as (your) Wakil.” 3 “O offspring of those whom We carried (in the ship) with Nuh! Verily, he was a grateful servant.”

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 17:2

Obviously, the speech of Allah, should not be quoted by Allah, thus showing the Tafsir is false.

Muhammad’s fallacy is name-dropping. Why does a real god need to drop the names of its prophets? Unless it’s an idol and Muhammad speaks for it and seeks power for himself.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.