Koran 16:75

Allah presents an example: a slave [who is] owned and unable to do a thing and he to whom We have provided from Us good provision, so he spends from it secretly and publicly.

Can they be equal?

Praise to Allah!

But most of them do not know.

Koran 16:75

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Note Muhammad’s approval of slavery here. Slavery is evil.

This is “good provision” according to Muslim scholars, a mother’s good meal:

…with good drink:

Meanwhile, in Pakistan: “Pakistan faced with dilemma of starvation and lockdown: PM Imran Khan” and in Yemen: “COVID-19 and Humanitarian Access in Starvation-Affected Countries: Part 1 – Yemen”. But perhaps these places aren’t really Islamic and none of these starving people are really truly Muslim?

In short, there’s never provision from Allah at all. The West doesn’t worship Allah and is vastly richer and free of starvation that inflicts the Islamic world. How can that be? So we can see that without Allah, the West is rich beyond the wildest imagination of Muhammad, and with imaginary Allah, the Islamic world is often starving to death and dirt poor? That’s the difference between the West and Islam. The West is better. Islam is vastly worse.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.