Koran 15:89-93

15:89 And say, “Indeed, I am the clear warner” –

90 Just as We had revealed [scriptures] to the separators 91 Who have made the Qur’an into portions.

92 So by your Lord, We will surely question them all 93 About what they used to do.

Koran 15:89-93

Again, Muhammad is directed by Allah (or Muhammad pretending to be Allah) to demote himself down to merely a warner with:

And say, “Indeed, I am the clear warner”

Koran 15:89

Note the “the”. This shows that Muhammad is the only “warner” from Allah, which is in accord with Allah being a stone idol and not being YHWH or God and Jesus. There are no official “warners” in the two Abrahamic religions, Judaism and Christianity.

The dash at the end of the verse of Koran 15:89 seems like a translation issue that Allah hasn’t yet found time to address in his busy schedule of blowing around sailing boats:

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

The “We” could also be the demon that possessed Muhammad speaking: “Just as We had revealed [scriptures] to the separators”.

Who are the “separators” who “have made the Qur’an into portions”? According to Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 15:89-93, it is:

They are the People of the Book, who divided the Book into parts, believing in some of it, and rejecting some of it.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 15:89-93

That seems kind of reasonable, except the Jews didn’t divide the Torah, and the Christians didn’t divide the Bible.

But, Infidel, it means the Jews and Christians dividing the BOOK into the Torah and the Bible! Except that the “book” was never sent down from Allah, and was never one book. Both the Torah and the Bible are the works of mere men, describing their interaction with YHWH or God and Jesus, and the Bible includes the Torah as the Old Testament. None of this came from Allah at all. For example, the Gospel of Luke is written by Luke as he tells us:

Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, ² just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. ³ With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, ⁴ so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.

NIV Luke 1:1-4

In the Koran, Muhammad himself is a “separator”, as he divides the Torah and Bible, splitting out the Psalms of David as a separate book. And note the Psalms of David. Again, this shows that the Psalms came from David and his musicians:

For the director of music. With stringed instruments. A psalm of David.

NIV Psalm 4

Also, according to Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 15:89, the “separators” could be those who had different opinions of Muhammad, the false prophet of false Allah:

Some have said that Al-Mutaqasimin [separators] refers to the Quraysh, that the Qur’an means this Qur’an as opposed to the Scriptures of the People of the Book﴾, and that “made it into parts” referred to what `Ata’ said that some of them said that he (the Prophet) was a sorcerer, some said he was crazy, or a soothsayer. These various allegations were the parts [portions].

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 15:89-93

A further story in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 15:89 elaborates on this, with what seems like a true story of the Quraysh:

…Al-Walid bin Al-Mughirah – holding a noble position among the people – rallied a group of Quraysh behind him when Al-Mawsim (the time for pilgrims to meet in Makkah for Hajj) had come. He said to them, “O people of Quraysh! The time of Al-Mawsim has come, and delegations of Arabs will come to you during this time. They will have heard some things about this companion of yours (meaning the Prophet), so agree on one opinion, let there be no contradicting or denials of each other’s sayings”.

They said, “And you, O Abu `Abd Shams, give us an opinion and we will say that.”

He said, “No, you make the suggestions and I will listen.”

They said, “We say he is a soothsayer.”

He said, “He is not a soothsayer.”

They said, “We say he is crazy.”

He said, “He is not crazy.”

They said, “We say he is a poet.”

He said, “He is not a poet.”

They said, “We say he is a sorcerer.”

He said, “He is not a sorcerer.”

They said, “So what should we say”

He said, “By Allah, what he says is as palatable to the average person as something sweet, so you cannot say anything against it without it being obviously false. Therefore the most appropriate thing you can say is that he is a sorcerer.”

So they left having agreed upon that, and Allah revealed concerning them: [verse 91]

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 15:89-93

As you can see, Muhammad’s enemy, Al-Walid bin Al-Mughirah, already acknowledges his own worship of Allah, the dead, stone idol of the Quraysh, and calls the words of Muhammad “something sweet”, so we know that Muhammad spoke honeyed words, in other words, lies tailored to the person or people he’s talking to. This is why it’s easy to show that Muhammad is incoherent, as his lies are not coherent with reality or even with himself in his Koran.

Thus the rest of the passage is simply a threat to these people that “separate” which is all the Jews, Christians, Quraysh and Muhammad (see earlier).

Muhammad can’t recite clearly what are supposedly the clear words of the clear Qur’an from clear Allah, then makes a threat. So the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.