Koran 14:47-51

14:47 So never think that Allah will fail in His promise to His messengers.

Indeed, Allah is Exalted in Might and Owner of Retribution.

48 [It will be] on the Day the earth will be replaced by another earth, and the heavens [as well], and all creatures will come out before Allah, the One, the Prevailing.

49 And you will see the criminals that Day bound together in shackles, 50 Their garments of liquid pitch and their faces covered by the Fire.

51 So that Allah will recompense every soul for what it earned.

Indeed, Allah is swift in account.

Koran 14:47-51

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Who is this passage addressed to? Obviously, it’s just Muhammad addressing this to himself and to his recitation, his Koran. Muhammad is failing to be a messenger to his people as he recites this passage.

Muhammad claims Allah is “Exalted in Might” yet, shows Allah is unable to pass on this message to others, those who would need this, and note Muhammad fails to pass on this message, thus showing Allah’s incompetence continues on from picking a messenger who can’t read.

Also, we would need to know what this “His promise” is to Muhammad, his “messenger”? But wait, earlier Muhammad demoted himself down to merely “witness” and in multiple places, Muhammad only claims to be a “warner”. See: Muhammad – Warner? So Allah has no prophet, no “messenger” and only “witness” and “warner”. So there’s no promise to his messengers at all, as Muhammad demoted himself, and thus, failed Allah.

But, Infidel, this means the prophets in the Scriptures! But they were prophets, not “messengers”, and they were prophets of YHWH and God/Jesus, not Allah, the idol.

But, Infidel, Allah is real! Not when Allah hires such incompetent “messengers” as Muhammad the self-demoting, “Warner” and “Witness”, obviously Muhammad is a false prophet, which means Allah is imaginary, a dead, broken, stone idol, like his nominal father “Slave of Allah” and the Quraysh worshipped in their Quraysh Polytheism.

Muhammad lied: “the earth will be replaced by another earth, and the heavens [as well]”. Obviously, Allah isn’t able to replace the heavens and the earth, because the Earth is IN the universe and always a part of the universe, not separate from the “heavens”. This phrase shows that Muhammad was describing what was above, “heavens”, and what was below, “earth”, which is a Flat Earth worldview. Thus Allah is imaginary, fictional and false, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

As for replacing the Earth and the Heavens, what point is that? Muhammad earlier shows that Islamic Paradise and Islamic Fire are attached to Earth and resurrected good Muslims go to Paradise and resurrected bad non-Muslims go to Fire. Now, Muhammad shows that the Earth will be replaced. So how will all the creatures come out before Allah, when the Earth they were standing, running, sleeping and flying upon suddenly disappears? Magic, obviously. And what’s the point? Muhammad abruptly drops describing what happens to the poor creatures, now that their homes and territories have been removed with the replacement of Earth #1 by Earth #2.

As for the criminals, note they’re “bound together in shackles” – what god needs that when according to Muhammad earlier, there are four or five angels per person? Surely these angels, who have no effect in reality, will be able to strongly hold criminal humans without the need for human-made “shackles”?

Muhammad recited: “So that Allah will recompense every soul for what it earned.” Note that “soul” here actually means person. After all, what shackle, made in China, can hold a literal soul to Earth?

Muhammad lied: “Their garments of liquid pitch and their faces covered by the Fire.” No one can make garments of liquid pitch. Except maybe the Chinese in their pitch clothing factories. So why is Allah clothing people in this stuff? And is there a choice? Perhaps:

Muhammad lied: “Indeed, Allah is swift in account.” But Allah is not swift to account. All those criminals in Muhammad’s time and place, his context, died long ago nearly 1400 years ago. 1400 years ago is NOT “swift”!

Allah’s swift justice, 1400 years of not happening, long after Muhammad died, obviously this is nonsense. The best replacement for this torture porn is: “”, the empty sentence.