Koran 11:1-4

11:1 Alif, Lam, Ra.

[This is] a Book whose verses are perfected and then presented in detail from [one who is] Wise and Acquainted.

2 [Through a messenger, saying], “Do not worship except Allah. Indeed, I am to you from Him a warner and a bringer of good tidings,”

3 And [saying], “Seek forgiveness of your Lord and repent to Him, [and] He will let you enjoy a good provision for a specified term and give every doer of favor his favor. But if you turn away, then indeed, I fear for you the punishment of a great Day. 4 To Allah is your return, and He is over all things competent.”

Koran 11:1-4

Muhammad abbreviated: “Alif, Lam, Ra.” This is a “Muqatta’at” or Mysterious Letters. As the Koran is supposedly the clear and perfect words of perfect Allah as recorded in perfect Allah’s perfect Qur’an, this sentence should not exist in Muhammad’s Koran, as they are not clear and they are not capable of being translated into English words.

Muhammad imperfectly recites: “[This is] a Book whose verses are perfected”. Note the help placed by the translators – indicating that this phrase in this verse is imperfect, even if we discard the prior “Muqatta’at” or Mysterious Letters. Also if this recitation was perfect, then why are the verses “perfected”? How does one successively perfect the perfect words in the perfect verses of the perfect Qur’an written perfectly by perfect Allah before the perfect world was created, perfectly?

Muhammad is corrected by the translators: “[Through a messenger, saying],” This is the translators correcting the perfect recitation of the perfect reciter of the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah, before the perfect world was created, perfectly.

Muhammad disagrees with the translators: “Indeed, I am to you from Him a warner” Yet the translator calls Muhammad a “messenger”, but here Muhammad is saying a “warner”. Which one is right? And recall, in Islam, Muhammad is called the prophet of Islam, not “warner” or “messenger”.

Muhammad lied: “a bringer of good tidings”. There are no good tidings from Muhammad at all. Look in this passage – no good tidings at all.

Muhammad fails: “Do not worship except Allah.” Note that Muhammad actually fails to recite this.

Muhammad continues to be stupid: “then presented in detail from [one who is] Wise and Acquainted.” And note the addition by the translator – otherwise this verse is claiming Muhammad is “Wise” (LOL) and “Acquainted” (surely not!).

And the translators seem to miss: “And [saying]” There’s no need for this, as the previous sentence was speech and this could carry on. This indicates that there was a scribal problem here in the Koran and it’s been covered up by this mistake.

Muhammad shows Allah does nothing with: “He will let you enjoy a good provision for a specified term”. Note that good provision always comes from human minds and effort, not from Allah. If this “good provision” actually came from Allah, Allah should have said: “Allah gives you good provision, as good rains, massive harvests, lots of calves, and plenty of children!” But instead, Muhammad shows Allah does nothing, thus showing Allah is a broken, dead, stone idol incapable of doing anything, except by coincidence.

Muhammad makes a false promise: “give every doer of favor his favor.” Yet no “doer of favor” has ever received favor from Allah. Good Muslims die in Jihad and their remains are buried. No favor. Good Muslims do good deeds and no favor ever comes to them from Allah.

Muhammad threatens: “But if you turn away, then indeed, I fear for you the punishment of a great Day.” The end times or “great Day” never happened for those who turned away. No “great Day” has ever happened at all.

Muhammad lied: “To Allah is your return”. We don’t come from Allah, so how can we “return” to him? Want more proof? Go to a cemetery of Muslims. Their bodies, now bones and dust, are still here, just like in the cemeteries of Jews, Christians, atheists, and people of other religions. If Muslims returned to Allah, then these cemeteries would no longer have dead bodies in them.

Muhammad doesn’t glorify Allah: “He is over all things competent.” Shouldn’t this be: “I am overall, the god of all” or something simpler and more grand? Competence is something most humans can do in their favourite skill. For example, a competent singer can sing competently:

So Allah is “competent” like this merely human, “competent” singer? Or is God sublime?

Muhammad Allah commands Muhammad to: “Say” or “Recite”. This means that this passage is addressed to Muhammad, not to all people. Thus, this passage can’t be in the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. As it is addressed to Muhammad, in his time and place, his context, this also means that this passage is locked to Muhammad’s context and can’t be in the context-free, perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah with all its perfect words. Thus, this passage is part of Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are incoherent and false, meaning Allah is incoherent, imaginary, fictional, and false.

Muhammad lies, threatens and uses the wrong words, and the translators help Muhammad out. This passage is a demonstration of incompetence by Muhammad, badly covered up by the translators. As such the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.