Koran 10:90-92

10:90 And We took the Children of Israel across the sea, and Pharaoh and his soldiers pursued them in tyranny and enmity until, when drowning overtook him, he said, “I believe that there is no deity except that in whom the Children of Israel believe, and I am of the Muslims.”

91 Now?

And you had disobeyed [Him] before and were of the corrupters?

92 So today We will save you in body that you may be to those who succeed you a sign.

And indeed, many among the people, of Our signs, are heedless.

Koran 10:90-92

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Did you notice Pharaoh’s Shahada? I wonder why he, Pharaoh, doesn’t believe Muhammad was the last prophet of Allah, a god that Moses didn’t worship? Perhaps that’s why Jibril was there, stuffing Pharaoh’s mouth full of mud after he said his shahada, underwater, where no one could hear:

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:

that the Messenger of Allah said:

When Allah drowned Fir’awn he said: “I believe that there is no god except the One that the children of Isra’il believe in.”

So Jibrail said: “O Muhammad! If you could only have seen me, while I was taking (the mud) from the sea, and filling his mouth out of fear that the mercy would reach him.”

Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3107

Perhaps this is why this hadith is graded Hassan above and better than Daif, as it shows Muhammad is incoherent about the Shahada, and so Allah is Muhammad. And of course, the children of Israel, the Israelites, believed in YHWH, not Allah AKA Baal. For more, see, Allah – Rain God?

Note the incoherent nonsense of rhetorical questions to a mere man, a pharaoh amongst many pharaohs. Worse, isn’t this man, dead? Why talk to a dead man, a corpse? Truly Muhammad was a necromancer, talking to dead people and asking them questions they can’t answer, as they’re dead. You’ll note that I ask my rhetorical questions to you, a living reader, not to the dead. Truly Muhammad was mad.

The Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 10:90-92, explains this passage by referring to several other chapters of Muhammad’s Koran, in an effort to consolidate the many repeated stories of Moses together to try to form a coherent narrative. Thus they inadvertently produce a better chapter than Muhammad and Allah could. For more, see: A Surah Like It?

In the scripture, the Torah and Bible, the Pharaoh, along with his army, simply drown. The body of Pharaoh isn’t thrown up on shore at all. His body was never a sign to future pharaohs at all. None of this is recorded by the Ancient Egyptians at all. There are no signs from Allah at all.

But, Infidel, it’s about the mummy of Pharaoh that’s preserved! There are many preserved “mummies” all carefully wrapped by the Ancient Egyptians. They can’t wrap bodies that are lost at sea.

But, but, Infidel, the body of Pharaoh is preserved in the Bible! Let’s look:

28 The water flowed back and covered the chariots and horsemen—the entire army of Pharaoh that had followed the Israelites into the sea. Not one of them survived.

29 But the Israelites went through the sea on dry ground, with a wall of water on their right and on their left. 30 That day the Lord saved Israel from the hands of the Egyptians, and Israel saw the Egyptians lying dead on the shore.

NIV Exodus 14:28-30

As you can see, it’s “Israel”, or Moses and the Israelites, that see the Egyptians lying dead on the shore. There’s nothing specific about the Pharaoh surviving by himself, or being by himself. Clearly the “sign” is for Israel only, not for the Egyptians, for Moses and the Israelites, according to the Scripture. This “sign” is merely the aftermath of the drowning of Pharaoh and his army by the miraculous return of the waters parted by God/YHWH for Moses.

This verse is just a story, another lie by Muhammad, to pretend there are “signs” from Allah when there are no signs and no Allah. This means that Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false. So the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.