Koran 8:1

They ask you, [O Muhammad], about the bounties [of war].

Say, “The [decision concerning] bounties is for Allah and the Messenger.”

So fear Allah and amend that which is between you and obey Allah and His Messenger, if you should be believers.

Koran 8:1

Muhammad Allah commands Muhammad to: “Say” or “Recite”. This means that this passage is addressed to Muhammad, not to all people. Thus, this passage can’t be in the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. As it is addressed to Muhammad, in his time and place, his context, this also means that this passage is locked to Muhammad’s context and can’t be in the context-free, perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah with all its perfect words. Thus, this passage is part of Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are incoherent and false, meaning Allah is incoherent, imaginary, fictional, and false.

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Bounties of war? What’s this about? And who are the anonymous “they”? Let’s check with the demon-influenced and demon-possessed scholars of Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 8:1, who make clear what Allah and Muhammad can’t:

It was revealed concerning (the battle of) Badr.

Al-Anfal are the spoils of war; they were for the Messenger of Allah , and none had a share in them.

…the portion of the spoils of war that the commander gives to some of the fighters after dividing the bulk of the spoils.

It was also said that Anfal refers to the Khumus; one-fifth of the captured goods after four-fifths are divided between the fighters.

…the Anfal refers to the Fay’, the possessions taken from the disbelievers without fighting, and the animals, servants or whatever other possessions escape from the disbelievers to Muslims.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 8:1

So, as you can see, it’s about the Muslim soldiers at the battle of Badr and their recovery of loot from the battlefield and attacking the supply train at the rear, as well as capture of animals, enslaving people and looting everything of value to the Muslims.

Why was the verse revealed? Let’s check with the demon-influenced and demon-possessed scholars of Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 8:1, who make clear what Allah and Muhammad can’t:

…Sa`d bin Malik said, “I said, ‘O Allah’s Messenger, Allah has brought comfort to me today over the idolators, so grant me this sword.'”

Muhammad: “This sword is neither yours nor mine; put it down.”

So I put it down, but said to myself, ‘The Prophet might give this sword to another man who did not fight as fiercely as I did.’

I heard a man calling me from behind and I said, “Has Allah revealed something in my case?”

Muhammad: “You asked me to give you the sword, but it is not for me to decide about. However, it has been granted to me (by Allah), and I give it to you.”

So Allah sent down this Ayah,…

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 8:1

As you can see from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 8:1, this is in regards to the division of spoils at the battle of Badr, probably in respect to one Muslim bandit, or maybe reused by Muhammad to apply to a group of Muslim bandits arguing about the loot and who got what. Note especially that this verse is locked to Muhammad’s time and place, the battle of Badr and its aftermath, Muhammad’s context and its relation to one Muslim bandit or possibly all of them. This is confirmed by Muhammad’s statement right at the start: “They ask you, [O Muhammad], about the bounties [of war].” The “they” are the Muslim bandit about the sword he found, the other Muslim bandits fighting over the spoils of war, or both combined.

Notice how Muhammad contradicts Islamic Fate: “The [decision concerning] bounties is for Allah and the Messenger.” This immediately shows that Muhammad is taking all the loot, then handing it out to satisfy the apparent desires, greed, needs and wants of the bandits that Muhammad can perceive.

But, Infidel, the decision comes from Allah! Which means that Allah contradicts Islamic fate.

But, Infidel, Muhammad and Allah decide together which means it doesn’t contradict Islamic Fate! So, Muhammad and Allah are deciding on the Fate of a bandit and their bandits? And according to the bandits, who want stuff? And this is Islamic Fate?

But, but, but, Infidel, this is part of Fate! No, it’s not. You saw yourself from the account in Tafsir that the one bandit especially desired the sword he found, how he was forced to give it to Muhammad, and then Muhammad chose to give it back to the bandit, which is trying to make the bandit thankful to Muhammad. None of this is fate at all, just Muhammad socially trying to make himself superior to the bandit.

But worse, is this, Muhammad is long dead. How can Muhammad and Allah decide, when according to Tafsir, Muhammad needs to see the situation first to decide on how to split up loot? And of course, Muhammad needs to be alive too.

Obviously, this verse is given in response to loot disputes is an obvious admission that Muhammad can’t even think ahead and demonstrates that he’s a false prophet and a liar. Muhammad’s last sentence is itself an appeal to fear fallacy, fear Allah or else! The best replacement for this verse is: “”, the empty sentence.