Koran 7:4-7

7:4 And how many cities have We destroyed, and Our punishment came to them at night or while they were sleeping at noon.

5 And their declaration when Our punishment came to them was only that they said, “Indeed, we were wrongdoers!”

6 Then We will surely question those to whom [a message] was sent, and We will surely question the messengers.

7 Then We will surely relate [their deeds] to them with knowledge, and We were not [at all] absent.

Koran 7:4-7

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Muhammad claims: “And how many cities”. Perhaps you could name and place these on a map here, Muhammad? Allah and Muhammad’s inability to show these cities on a map, their inability to even name these cities, show that Muhammad is spreading rumours. We don’t know what caused ancient cities to be destroyed. Certainly, some were destroyed for other reasons, like, for example, Medina being destroyed by Muslim bandits led by the bandit leader Muhammad, or Mecca, likewise destroyed by the warlord Muhammad and his Muslim soldiers. Recall that for Medina and Mecca, none of the inhabitants was able to say: “Indeed, we were wrongdoers!”. In both cases, the battle for both of these places happened while the inhabitants were awake and unaware of Muhammad’s bandit attacks.

Muhammad claims: “Indeed, we were wrongdoers!” Why are the imperfect words of imperfect people in the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah here? Recall that these people were asleep at night or napping during Noon: “came to them at night or while they were sleeping at noon”, thus they were unable to speak, and obviously knew not what was happening. So we know that Muhammad was lying.

Muhammad is unsure: “Then We will surely question” and confused. If these cities were destroyed in the past by Allah and all their people were killed by Allah’s action, then why are they being questioned in Muhammad’s future? Surely it would be more efficient and more just for Allah to do that in the past, before Muhammad comes along, pretending to be Allah, the dead, broken, stone idol?

Muhammad is confused: “We will surely question the messengers.” Why? There’s no need for this with Allah’s perfect words in perfect Allah’s perfect Qur’an, being recited perfectly by Allah’s perfect messengers in the past, along with perfect Allah’s perfect Fate and Allah’s perfect omniscience, right? All this shows is that Allah is imperfect, which means Allah is incoherent, and thus false, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are incoherent, nonsensical and false.

Muhammad is confused: “Then We will surely relate [their deeds] to them with knowledge”. Again, why? There’s no need to do this, as the deeds of these dead people and the dead messengers are already known to the dead people and dead messengers. Also why the curious phrase: “with knowledge”? Is it Muhammad’s admission that he doesn’t know, and imaginary Allah is unable to tell him?

Muhammad lied: “We were not [at all] absent.” Ah, but Muhammad was indeed absent, as he was not alive then, and he’s unable to even name these dead cities, their dead people, and the dead messengers that were sent to them, whose words were not written in any holy book at all.

This passage is simply an appeal to fear fallacy, addressed to what is probably the people of Mecca, the Quraysh, after being attacked during the day when they weren’t asleep. Note that the people of Mecca were unable to say: “Indeed, we were wrongdoers!” How do we know? It’s not recorded here by silly Muhammad. Worse, Mecca is still intact and has been rebuilt repeatedly by its people and latterly by the Saudi Arabian government. Isn’t that clock tower over the Kaaba quite fine?

Thus we know this passage is Muhammad’s incoherent nonsense and the best replacement is: “”, the empty sentence.