Koran 4:7-10

4:7 For men is a share of what the parents and close relatives leave, and for women is a share of what the parents and close relatives leave, be it little or much – an obligatory share.

8 And when [other] relatives and orphans and the needy are present at the [time of] division, then provide for them [something] out of the estate and speak to them words of appropriate kindness.

9 And let those [executors and guardians] fear [injustice] as if they [themselves] had left weak offspring behind and feared for them. So let them fear Allah and speak words of appropriate justice.

10 Indeed, those who devour the property of orphans unjustly are only consuming into their bellies fire. And they will be burned in a Blaze.

Koran 4:7-10

According to Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 4:7, these verses were revealed after they were needed:

…Umm Kujjah came to the Messenger of Allah and said to him, “O Messenger of Allah! I have two daughters whose father died, and they do not own anything.” So Allah revealed…

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 4:7

This false “revelation” happened after the incident that caused it’s need, not before. Thus Muhammad reveals that Allah is false, that Muhammad is a false prophet and Islam is nonsensical.

Note that the division of what’s left behind by the dead is not specified by Muhammad – these shares seem to be equal (this contradicts Islamic doctrine) for all men, women, relatives, orphans, and the unrelated poor. Muhammad also seems unable to take in to account the wishes expressed in the will of the deceased – thus property rights are not respected by Muhammad and Islam. So if you’re a dying Muslim, give away your property as you see fit before you die, otherwise Muhammad will have the “needy” eat up equal shares of what you have, after you die, leaving your loved ones with far less.

Muhammad can’t think of the right words, so he leaves them out: “speak to them words of appropriate kindness.” Who should be speaking to them? The dead person? Or is this merely Muhammad being the “kindly” divider of wealth for his dead men? A bit hard for Muhammad to do this, when he’s dead now. Note that the translator had to add: “[executors and guardians]” to make the next phrase make more sense. Adding to the Koran to help it make sense, shows that Allah is imaginary, and Muhammad is stupid and ignorant, and a false prophet.

Consider one of Muhammad’s Muslim bandits dying unexpectedly from a infected wound in his sleep leaving behind his camel, a good spear, scimitar, shield, breastplate and his share of the loot from the battle, 1 cask of wine, 11 Dirham, 1 slave girl and 1 slave boy. Now consider dividing his estate amongst his wife, son and daughter and, say, 17 needy Muslims. How does one equally divide up these items between 20 people? Does his strong son get the camel, spear, scimitar, shield, breastplate, the majority of the estate to be an effective soldier in Muhammad’s bandit army? Or is everything (including the slaves) sold at a loss, to make a pile of coin to divide up equally between 20 people? Nothing about this from Muhammad.

Muhammad: “Indeed, those who devour the property of orphans unjustly are only consuming into their bellies fire.” How does one avoid this horrible fate, when clearly the son needs his father’s arms, armour and mount to be a good Muslim soldier, yet, equal shares have to be given to the needy who are around at the time? If only Allah was real to solve this problem. But that’s impossible, as Allah is imaginary as Muhammad’s mistakes have shown us. Thus the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.