Koran 2:247

And their prophet said to them, “Indeed, Allah has sent to you Saul as a king.”

They said, “How can he have kingship over us while we are more worthy of kingship than him and he has not been given any measure of wealth?”

He said, “Indeed, Allah has chosen him over you and has increased him abundantly in knowledge and stature. And Allah gives His sovereignty to whom He wills. And Allah is all-Encompassing [in favor] and Knowing.”

Koran 2:247

The first mistake by Muhammad: “…their prophet…”. What perfect god would forget the name of their prophet? Thus you know immediately that this verse is from Muhammad, not from the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an of perfect Allah. The second mistake, “Allah has sent”. What god sends kings? I thought it was angels, prophets and messengers?

The verse is supposedly about Samuel anointing Saul as the first King of Israel. Have a read of what should be in this verse from the Jews here about Saul, the first king of Israel. Note the huge wealth of detail from the Torah and Rabbinical account compared to the corrupt summary of Muhammad, which gets things reversed, with wrong and nonsensical speeches which shouldn’t be amongst the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an of perfect Allah.

Note the problem pointed out by the “Israelis” that “Saul” should not be king as he has no “measure of wealth”. Muhammad, as the un-named “prophet” is unable to demonstrate the abundance of Allah in this respect, despite Allah supposedly creating all the rubies, sapphires, emeralds and diamonds, and all the copper, silver, gold and platinum in the world. Instead, Muhammad has Allah supposedly granting “knowledge” and “stature”. The last is genetics and adequate food, and the first is the choices made in learning. None of this is affected by Allah at all. Note also Muhammad claims that sovereignty comes from Allah, yet, many peoples have kings – obviously, this is not from Allah at all. Consider, if fighting is so important for Islam to conquer the world, then why is Allah raising up kings to oppose Islam? Obviously, this is contradictory, showing Islam is in conflict with itself, thus Islam is false.

This corrupt summary by Muhammad shows his stupidity and shows that Allah is imaginary, in being unable to correct Muhammad, unable to name the prophet involved and unable to provide the complete story. So the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.