Koran 2:172-173

2:172 O you who have believed, eat from the good things which We have provided for you and be grateful to Allah if it is [indeed] Him that you worship.

173 He has only forbidden to you dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah.

But whoever is forced [by necessity], neither desiring [it] nor transgressing [its limit], there is no sin upon him.

Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

Koran 2:172-173

Note the mistake made by Muhammad: “O you who have believed…”. The mistake is the word “have”, which refers to Muhammad’s past. So this means that this passage is addressed to ex-Muslims, reasonable people who have left Islam and who no longer obey Muhammad Allah. This is incoherent and shows that this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah.

But, Infidel, it really means “O you who believed…”! So you leave out a word from Muhammad Allah, thus disobeying the doctrine of Islam? Note that “believed” is also in the past tense, so now you’re incoherent too, like Muhammad Allah.

But, but, Infidel, it really means “O you believers,…”! So you leave out a word from Muhammad Allah AND change a word of Muhammad Allah? Tsk, tsk. Ah, but isn’t it better to simply say: “Muslims,…”? Obviously, this is more concise and better and isn’t imposing Islamic dietary doctrine upon others, thus making Islam more tolerant than Islam. So you know from this that Allah is imaginary, and Islam and Islamic doctrine are contradictory nonsense.

Note the ignorance of Muhammad: “…the good things which We have provided for you…”. I thought Allah was ONE, not two or more (“We”)? Who’s preaching polytheism now, Muhammad? I thought Muhammad was a monotheist, right?

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

But, Infidel, Muhammad was referring to Muhammad and Allah! Muhammad is dead. So how can he provide? Muhammad never gave you food at all. You know this. You can’t be grateful to Muhammad Allah when he hasn’t given you any food.

Bu, but, Infidel, it’s the royal “We”, it’s just Allah! OK, so you have improved upon Muhammad and Allah, which is contrary to Islamic doctrine, but there’s still just one tiny little problem,… In a famine, why isn’t Allah providing food? In a famine, there’s little or no food. Obviously, Allah hasn’t provided at all, as everyone is starving. How can you be grateful to Muhammad Allah when you have little or, worse, nothing to eat at all? Despite you being a better Muslim than Muhammad?

And there’s another mistake: “We have provided for you…”. Allah doesn’t provide good things for food. Look at the picture above, imagine being hungry and sitting down there and waiting for Allah to provide. If you’re at home, your mother will give you some good food to eat. Obviously, your mother is not Allah, is she? Perhaps you’re older and married. Your wife notices you there and gives you some good food to eat. Obviously, your wife is not Allah, is she? Perhaps you visit a restaurant or café and sit down there. A waiter comes over and asks you what you want to eat, perhaps suggesting that the chef’s special, hummus, is good today. Obviously, the waiter is not Allah, is he? Neither is the chef with today’s special, authentic hummus. Perhaps you’re studying at a university and you’re hungry and sit down, ready to eat. Does Allah appear and give you a nice hummus meal, ready to eat? No, instead you’ll have to prepare your hummus meal from ingredients, using various techniques and eventually ending up with a hummus meal of your own creation, contradicting Allah Muhammad. And of course, if you’re a young woman, you already know that it’s women that so often work hard to provide meals for your husband, sons, infirm parents, and family – you know that Allah doesn’t provide, but you do, thus you know Allah is false and Islam and Islamic doctrine is worthless nonsense.

Another mistake by Muhammad: “He has only forbidden…”. This is Muhammad referring to Allah while forgetting that he’s supposed to be pretending to be Allah who’s speaking. I don’t think you can excuse this obvious mistake.

Yet another mistake from Muhammad: “[forbidden] …dead animals…”. Note that this means that Muslims can’t eat animals unless they are LIVING, and so Muslims must bite off the flesh from the struggling living animal like starving hyenas. Wow! That’s barbaric and horrific! What a turn about from Islamic doctrine! Obviously Muslims today, don’t do this. Also, note the incoherence later: “[forbidden] …the flesh of swine…”. What Muhammad probably meant was that Muslims are forbidden to eat carrion, the flesh of DEAD animals, who are killed by predators or disease, and were diseased or infected. Note that animals are usually stunned, slaughtered, their blood drained, then skinned and butchered, and various cuts of meat are produced from the carcass for later cooking and eating.

Note that this passage shows the ignorance of Muhammad, in being unable to correctly summarise and convey the dietary laws of the Jews from the Torah to Muhammad’s Koran. Once you understand that Muhammad is referring to Torah, you’ll see how he badly summarises the Torah and gets it wrong. This shows that the Islamic diet is based on the Jewish diet from the Torah with relaxation in case of need (deprivation and starvation). Thus this shows that the Islam and Islamic doctrine are incoherent, as they require the Torah to be correct.

Why was Muhammad trying to put in badly the Jewish laws about food? Because he’s trying to join his religion to Judaism (and Christianity) by incorporating their food laws. Tawhid!

Also note this phrase: “…that which has been dedicated to other…”. Who would go around stealing roasted meat from altars devoted to idols? What kind of Muslim in Muhammad’s time was that desperate, that he would sneak into Mecca from Medina to eat roasted meat from the idols there, that he would need to be warned by Muhammad Allah? Or is it, that some “Muslims” in Muhammad’s bandit camp were secretly polytheists sacrificing to other gods (idols like Allah), and Muhammad was trying to stamp out this practice?

Thus the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.