95:1 By the fig and the olive 2 And [by] Mount Sinai 3 And [by] this secure city [Makkah], 4 We have certainly created man in the best of stature; 5 Then We return him to the lowest of the low, 6 Except for those who believe and do righteous deeds, for they will have a reward uninterrupted.
7 So what yet causes you to deny the Recompense?
8 Is not Allah the most just of judges?
Koran 95
Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.
Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.
So, Allah swears by the olive and the fig, a fruit supposedly created by him, and by Mount Sinai, a mountain supposedly created by him, and by “this secure city”, a city supposedly created by Abraham and his son, not by Allah.
But, Infidel, it was Allah, as the verse says! So, Abraham and his son, didn’t create Kaaba and Mecca? OK.
But, Infidel, it was Allah through the hands of Abraham and his son! Uh-huh, so why is Allah swearing by his creations, and the creation of his prophet, Abraham and his son? It’s as if they’re the only noticeable things about Allah are the fig and olive, both domesticated by ancient humans and Mecca, created by pagan humans.
Archaeobotanists have found evidence that the dawn of agriculture may have come with the domestication of fig trees in the Near East some 11,400 years ago, roughly 1,000 years before such staples as wheat, barley, and legumes were domesticated in the region.
Figs likely first domesticated crop
Olive domestication:
The olive tree (Olea europaea var. europaea) is thought to have been domesticated from the wild oleaster (Olea europaea var. sylvestris), at a minimum of nine different times. The earliest probably dates to the Neolithic migration into the Mediterranean basin, ~6000 years ago.
Archaeology and History of Olive Domestication
So why didn’t Allah swear by the grape, date and honey? A real god has no need to swear upon the temporary things of his own creation. Muhammad is name-dropping, and by doing so, shows his god is imaginary.
Petra is an ancient city that lies in present-day Jordan and dates back to the fourth century B.C.
The Nabateans living and trading in Petra soon accumulated a significant amount of wealth, and an envious Greek Empire attacked the city in 312 B.C. This event marks the first reference to Petra in recorded history.
In fact, the Romans would invade Petra in 106 A.D., and ultimately forced the Nabateans to surrender. The Roman Empire annexed the newly gained territory and changed its name to Arabia Petraea.
They continued to rule over the city for more than 250 years until the middle of the fourth century A.D., when an earthquake destroyed many of its buildings. The Byzantines eventually took control of the region, and governed Petra for some 300 years.
After the eighth century, when Petra was largely abandoned as a trading center, its stone structures were used for shelter by nomadic shepherds for several centuries.
Petra, History
Notice the lies of Muhammad continue with: “We have certainly created man in the best of stature;” Remember Muhammad acknowledged that there were weak-minded people:
And do not give the weak-minded your property, which Allah has made a means of sustenance for you, but provide for them with it and clothe them and speak to them words of appropriate kindness.
Koran 4:5
How does one reconcile “weak-minded” with “best of stature”? And what about aged and infirm parents? Thus, we know Muhammad was a liar and Allah false, which means Islam, Koran and Muhammad are false.
But, Infidel, “Then We return him to the lowest of the low”! That refers to placing evil people or rather those people who do not believe Muhammad, in the “abyss”, Islamic Fire. Note that this is a point of contention cleared by the scholars of Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 95:1.
Muhammad renames and confuses again: “So what yet causes you to deny the Recompense?” What’s a “Recompense”, Muhammad? No answer from dead Muhammad, imaginary Allah and false angel Jibril. So, let’s check with the scholars of Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 95:1, who write:
in the recompense that will take place in the Hereafter.
Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 95:1
Renaming shows Muhammad is corrupting his own supposed message. For more, see Muhammad’s Renames.
Muhammad asks: “Is not Allah the most just of judges?” Obviously, Allah is the worst of judges. No justice for 1400 years.
Muhammad’s rhetorical questions haven’t stood the test of time – obviously, Muhammad’s message is not timeless, but limited and local, and thus false.
The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.
Koran Contradiction 