Koran 54:33-40

54:33 The people of Lot denied the warning.

34 Indeed, We sent upon them a storm of stones, except the family of Lot – We saved them before dawn.

35 As favor from Us.

Thus do We reward he who is grateful.

36 And he had already warned them of Our assault, but they disputed the warning.

37 And they had demanded from him his guests, but We obliterated their eyes, [saying], “Taste My punishment and warning.”

38 And there came upon them by morning an abiding punishment.

39 So taste My punishment and warning.

40 And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:33-40

Another corrupt repetition with a corrupt variation of the story of Lot. Obviously, corrupt repetitions with corrupt variations are incoherent with the notion that Allah is one, but are coherent with a madman ranting in anger.

But wait, where’s the corrupt repetition with corrupt variation of the story of Shuaib? Looks like Muhammad forgot that one, or maybe the scribes dropped those pages and didn’t notice?

Notice that verse 40 is a corrupt repetition of verses 32, 22 and 17 from the previous passages:

And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:40

And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:32

And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:22

And We have certainly made the Qur’ān easy for remembrance, so is there any who will remember?

Koran 54:17

Obviously this is done for rhyming purposes to make a better song, without regard to the message that Allah is one, not four repeats.

So I’ll just repeat my criticism from the previous passage:

Muhammad claims the “Quran” is “easy for remembrance”, yet had multiple problems with himself forgetting the Koran, other people getting it wrong, many versions circulating around, and worse, it’s in Classical Arabic, and has to be sung. Thus, this shows all written Korans are false, as they do not show how to correctly sing the Koran. And of course, a sung Koran, in Classical Arabic, is local to Muhammad and friends, so showing Allah, Islam, and the Koran are local to Muhammad, which means they’re all false.

And if the “Quran” is “easy for remembrance”, then what’s the point of a written Koran? Particularly when reading Muhammad’s Koran repeatedly shows that Muhammad was a false prophet, for a false god, Allah, for a false religion, Islam, without even a false book, the Koran.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.