Koran 43:21-25

43:21 Or have We given them a book before it [i.e., the Qur’ān] to which they are adhering?

22 Rather, they say, “Indeed, we found our fathers upon a religion, and we are in their footsteps [rightly] guided.”

23 And similarly, We did not send before you any warner into a city except that its affluent said, “Indeed, we found our fathers upon a religion, and we are, in their footsteps, following.”

24 [Each warner] said, “Even if I brought you better guidance than that [religion] upon which you found your fathers?”

They said, “Indeed we, in that with which you were sent, are disbelievers.”

25 So We took retribution from them; then see how was the end of the deniers.

Koran 43:21-25

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Note the rhetorical question, which only serves to confuse the listener (reader). My reaction when I read this was that I was confused, wondering if there was an earlier book or recitation to the Quraysh, the Nabateans. As you can see, my reaction is one of the reasons why a rhetorical question misses the mark in a book supposedly written by a god, but actually coming from Muhammad and his friends, in Muhammad’s time and place, Muhammad’s context, and later written by Muslims.

Now consider Islamic mythology, which states that the Qur’an was composed before the “worldS” were created by Allah, and thus, should be available to the Quraysh tribe before Muhammad arrived from his father, Waraqa. Obviously, Muhammad didn’t adhere to or know about Islamic mythology when he recited this, right?

Muhammad, in his Koran, addresses a sentence, verse, or passage to “Anonymous They”, with “they”, “them”, “he”, “your”, “the people”, and so on, without naming them. For more, read Anonymous They.

Muhammad includes the imperfect words of imperfect others, an interlocutor who is only in Muhammad’s mind, instead of the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. This means that Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, is not from Allah, which means Allah, Muhammad, Islamic doctrine, Islam, and Koran are incoherent and false.

Notice how the answer of the Quraysh, the Nabateans, is corruptly repeated with corrupt repetition by Muhammad as the answer by a sinful people supposedly long destroyed by Allah. Obviously, the words of Muhammad, the Quraysh (Nabateans) and a long since dead people are far more important than the words of impotent Allah, the idol of Muhammad.

Also note how the Quraysh try to include Muhammad’s father in their tribe with “our fathers” but Muhammad denies being of his tribe with: “your fathers“. Muhammad knew he was illegitimate and so not of his tribe. Thus, he wasn’t from “his” people, and so, he was a false prophet.

All Muhammad has are threats, and those don’t work when they’re ignored, as the Quraysh shunned Muhammad and cast him out. This is gross incompetence on the part of Muhammad, showing Allah is Muhammad, Muhammad is Allah, so Islam and the Koran are false.

Muhammad makes threats, they don’t come true. Muhammad was a false prophet, for a false god, Allah, for a false religion, Islam, without even a false book, Koran.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.