Koran 22:8-10

22:8 And of the people is he who disputes about Allah without knowledge or guidance or an enlightening book [from Him], 9 Twisting his neck [in arrogance] to mislead [people] from the way of Allah.

For him in the world is disgrace, and We will make him taste on the Day of Resurrection the punishment of the Burning Fire [while it is said], 10 “That is for what your hands have put forth and because Allah is not ever unjust to [His] servants.”

Koran 22:8-10

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Who is this “he”?

Infidel, it’s YOU! But, I’m not of “the people” am I? Note that I learned most of what is known about Allah from Muhammad in his Koran and in the hadith about Allah and Muhammad. Surely, studying Muhammad’s Koran and hadith counts a little towards knowledge, right? As for guidance, sure I have none from Allah, despite my request for guidance, here:

Oh Allah, please give me guidance by giving me a Xeroxed copy of your perfect Qur’an with your perfect words in perfect English, please.

Me, asking Allah for guidance

Nothing happened. Perhaps Allah lacks a Xerox photocopier machine? Or there’s some other problem?

Oh Allah, please give me guidance by giving me a perfect digital copy of your perfect Qur’an with your perfect words in perfect English, please.

Me, asking Allah for guidance

Nothing happened. Perhaps Allah suffers from a technological problem?

Oh Allah, please give me guidance by mailing me a perfect copy of your perfect Qur’an with your perfect words in perfect English, please.

Me, asking Allah for guidance

Nothing happened. Perhaps Allah can’t afford postage or the English version is too big to send down from Heaven by Jibril? Let’s use these guys:

Oh Allah, please give me guidance by giving me a perfect copy of your perfect Qur’an with your perfect words in perfect English, via your angels on my shoulders, please.

Me, asking Allah for guidance

Nothing happened. Looks like instead of being one, Allah is none.

Let’s compare with Muhammad. Muhammad had no knowledge about Allah – Muhammad simply lied. Muhammad had no guidance from Allah – Muhammad did evil and covered it up with lies. Muhammad had no “enlightening book [from Him]” – at best the perfect Qur’an with the perfect words of perfect Allah lies discarded in the mud at the bottom of the dark cave, while Muhammad simply lied about Allah and Jibril. So obviously, Muhammad is talking about himself.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.

But, Infidel, it’s about someone else!!! Oh, OK, let’s check the scholars in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 22:8, then:

And here He [Allah] tells us about those who call others to misguidance, the leaders of disbelief and innovation

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 22:8

Let’s think, there’s the Quraysh tribe who already worshipped Allah and his daughters:

38:4 And they wonder that there has come to them a warner from among themselves. And the disbelievers say, “This is a magician and a liar. 5 Has he made the gods [only] one God? Indeed, this is a curious thing.”

Koran 38:4-5

Hmmm, and they complain that Muhammad has made the “gods” into “one God”. That’s an innovation, right? After all, if we take away the three daughters of Allah:

53:19 So have you considered al-Lat and al-‘Uzza? 20 And Manat, the third – the other one?

Satan tempted Muhammad to utter the following line:
These are the exalted gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for.

Koran 53:19-20

Or put them back in again, as Muhammad does here, surely that’s an innovation, right?

Seems like the scholars agree, that the passage is talking about the person who calls others to misguidance (the caller is Muhammad), the leader in disbelief, and innovation, Muhammad.

But, Infidel, it’s about someone else NOT Muhammad! Perhaps it’s about that same person earlier?

And of the people is he who disputes about Allah without knowledge and follows every rebellious devil.

Koran 22:3

We already know from the scholars earlier in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 22:3, who stated:

This Ayah was revealed about An-Nadr bin Al-Harith. This was also the view of Ibn Jurayj.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 22:3

Who was “An-Nadr bin Al-Harith”? Probably Nadr ibn al-Harith:

Nadr had accused Muhammad of plagiarism in his Quranic verses based on the stories of ancient people.

Al-Waqidi mentions a report that Nadr asked the Muslims why he was to be executed, they replied that it was for him persecuting and torturing the Muslim as well as ridiculing the Quran.

Nadr ibn al-Harith, Wikipedia

Obviously no free speech for critics of Muhammad’s recitation, of Muhammad’s Koran. And note, that I’m opposed to “persecuting and torturing” Muslims. I’m pro-Free Speech, a human right, mentioned in Article 19 of the UN Human Rights.

Obviously, a passage against a specific person and his supporters (of which I’m not one), means Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran comes from Muhammad (and friends) not from Jibril or Allah, thus showing Jibril, Allah, Islam, Koran and Muhammad are false.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.

But, Infidel,…! No more, this is triggering my Deja Vu.

But, Infidel, what is Deja Vu? Deja Vu:

while some psychiatrists ascribe it to a mismatching in the brain that causes the brain to mistake the present for the past.

What is déjà vu?

But, Infidel, what is Deja Vu? Something I’ve had happen to me, too many times. I only wish I could make it work on lottery tickets.

But, Infidel, what is Deja Vu? LOL

Having Deja Vu shows that Allah created human minds to be faulty. Thus, Allah is incompetent and incoherent, thus showing Jibril, Allah, Islam, Koran and Muhammad are false.

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.

But, Infidel,… what is Deja Vu?

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.