And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden, except by right.
And whoever is killed unjustly – We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life.
Indeed, he has been supported [by the law].
Koran 17:33
Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.
Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.
Notice how Muhammad permits murder with: “except by right”.
Also, Muhammad forgets that a murdered Muslim man might only leave a wife and perhaps daughters, having no heir to take revenge. Funny isn’t it, that Muhammad was murdered, had no heir and left only wives and daughters, isn’t it?

This verse is a corrupt repetition and variation of Muhammad’s own saying earlier in Koran 6:151:
Say, “…
And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden [to be killed] except by [legal] right.
This has He instructed you that you may use reason.”
Koran 6:151
Compare Muhammad’s blather with the commandment from God in the Torah and Bible:
You shall not murder.
God
Obviously, Muhammad’s special exception “except by right” is a corruption of God’s own commandment, showing that Islam is a corruption of Judaism and Christianity, showing Allah is not God/YHWH/Jesus, showing Allah is a false god, a stone idol, the puppet of Muhammad, despite Allah being the alternative personality of Muhammad the child.
Muhammad continues to insert the honour culture and revenge “justice” of the Quraysh with:
And whoever is killed unjustly – We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life. Indeed, he has been supported [by the law].
Koran 17:33
What are the “authority”, “limits” and “supported [by the law]”? In the Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 17:33, the scholars defend Islam and Muhammad and Allah, and carry on the honor culture of the Quraysh, first with a quote from Muhammad:
The blood of a Muslim who bears witness to La ilaha illallah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, is not permissible (to be shed) except in three cases: a soul for a soul (i.e., in the case of murder), an adulterer who is married, and a person who leaves his religion and deserts the Jama’ah.
Muhammad in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 17:33
Note that “who bears witness to La ilaha illallah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah” is the first mention (so far that I have noticed) of the Shahada or declaration of faith as a Muslim. The Shahada is not in the Koran at all, despite its obvious need.
In other words, Muhammad permits and encourages revenge for murder, revenge for adultery and revenge for leaving the congregation (Jama’ah), which is apostasy. Note that this explicitly shows that Muslims are NOT a people, are NOT a race, despite many people ignorantly presuming this in the West, but are a “Jama’ah”, a congregation or a CULT.
If the world were to be destroyed, it would be of less importance to Allah than the killing of a Muslim.
And whoever is killed wrongfully, We have given his heir the authority.
Muhammad in Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 17:33
Notice again that Muhammad while plainly talking as “himself”, speaks of himself as “We”, that’s Allah (Muhammad’s alternative personality) and Muhammad, the child. Or “We” could be this guy again:

The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.

[…] Qur’an 17:33 […]
LikeLike