16:24 And when it is said to them, “What has your Lord sent down?”
They say, “Legends of the former peoples,”
25 That they may bear their own burdens in full on the Day of Resurrection and some of the burdens of those whom they misguide without knowledge.
Unquestionably, evil is that which they bear.
Koran 16:24-25
Note the bad punctuation at the end of verse 24. This indicates that something was removed here, probably by later scribes.
Or it could simply be a translation issue that Allah in his pride hasn’t yet noticed and fixed. Either way, this shows an imperfection that shouldn’t be here, thus showing the Koran is imperfect, and thus not the words of Allah, thus Allah is imaginary, fictional, and false.
Note the phrase: “This is not but legends of the former peoples.” This is a common criticism of Muhammad and his stories.
And if I have to speculate what was possibly removed, then what better than something like this?
And they say, “Legends of the former peoples which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon.”
Koran 25:5
This conversation is entirely pointless nonsense. The tense of the first sentence show it’s set in the future, but the Quraysh were force converted into Islam and died out long ago. Muhammad is asking the Quraysh about what “your Lord” has sent down and they correctly reply that it’s legends. This shows that Muhammad knows of two gods. His own and the chief god of the Quraysh, and it shows that Muhammad accepts that the Quraysh “your Lord” has taken action in the past with his own question. In other words, this is shirk by Muhammad to accept another god as equal (or better) than Allah.
But, Infidel, you say that the chief god of the Quraysh is the same god as Allah?! Indeed, I do, so why does Muhammad quite clearly separate them and show both are false? Muhammad is accepting of two gods here, the chief god of the Quraysh and his own version of that same god, Allah, Hubal, Baal, Sin. Muhammad made another false god from a false god and all are idols. Muhammad was foolish. He should have not created his own version of Allah from the chief god of the Quraysh. He’d have been better off practising and preaching Christianity instead. Then he could have pointed out that the legends attributed to Allah/Hubal by the Quraysh came from the Bible and, earlier, the Torah, and pointed out that Allah/Hubal was a false god as it is. And most likely he would have been sainted and respected by the Catholic church, instead of being poisoned as a false prophet for a false god for a false cult.
And note that Muhammad was unable to reply with the same or better. Muhammad’s own stories are corrupt copies from Torah and Bible, and other sources, often repeated, and used as frameworks for him to role play in as the “prophet” of old and the Quraysh as the “former peoples”. See for yourself in: Stories.
So let’s ask Muhammad, “What has your Lord, Allah, sent down, Muhammad?”. That result is nothing, as it’s clear that the Koran comes from Muhammad and friends, along with copy/paste of what others have to say: “Legends of the former peoples,”. For more, see: Koran – Tales and Legends?
Obviously “Legends of the former peoples,” isn’t the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah, so Allah is false, Islam is false, Koran is false and Muhammad is false.
The best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.

[…] Qur’an 16:24-25 […]
LikeLike