Koran 10:2

Have the people been amazed that We revealed [revelation] to a man from among them, [saying], “Warn mankind and give good tidings to those who believe that they will have a [firm] precedence of honor with their Lord”?

[But] the disbelievers say, “Indeed, this is an obvious magician.”

Koran 10:2

Muhammad includes the imperfect words of imperfect others, an interlocutor who is only in Muhammad’s mind, instead of the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. This means that Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, is not from Allah, which means Allah, Muhammad, Islamic doctrine, Islam, and Koran are incoherent and false.

From Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 10:1-2, the context for this verse is:

Ibn Abbas that he said: “When Allah sent Muhammad as a Messenger, most of the Arabs denied him and his message and said: “Allah is greater than sending a human Messenger like Muhammad.””

Ibn Abbas said, “So Allah revealed:…” [this verse]

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 10:1-2

Note carefully that the Arabs already believed in Allah. Contrary to Muhammad’s insult, they were believers in Allah already, and not “disbelievers”. Let’s just emphasize that again:

[Arabs] said: “Allah is greater than sending a human messenger like Muhammad.”

Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 10:1-2

The Arabs already believed in Allah. They denied not Allah, but Muhammad. Why? Examine the verse carefully: “We”. Allah is one, not plural “We”. Allah’s companion or master isn’t Muhammad, but his wife, the Sun goddess, Ackbar, and their children Al Lat, Al Uzza and Manat, along with their protector, Lion. Allah wouldn’t speak for all the gods at once (“We”), thus Allah can’t be “We”, despite Muhammad’s insistence.

Muhammad in his foolishness, assigns himself not as a “messenger” or “prophet” but as the FEMALE companion to his MALE god by “We”?! Or perhaps worse, as the MALE companion to his MALE god?! Or far worse, as the higher deity that rules over Allah!!! This is just one reason why Muhammad was rejected by the Quraysh.

But let’s carry on, examining the nonsense of Muhammad, who says: “Warn mankind”. How is Muhammad supposed to do that, being merely a man? All he can do, at best, is warn his own people, the Quraysh, the pagans who already worshipped Allah, Ackbar, Al Lat, Al Uzza, Manat and Lion, along with other idols that they also valued, in their polytheistic paganism. So immediately when Muhammad says he’s to “Warn mankind”, his fellow Quraysh knew him to be a magician, a man who “speaks” for an idol, a ventriloquist, perhaps, and spoke the truth back to Muhammad, as Muhammad admits in his recording: “Indeed, this is an obvious magician.”

Also note the long rhetorical question, Muhammad makes. A real god has no need to ask a rhetorical question, as a rhetorical question is merely the tool of a human orator, unguided by gods.

Muhammad claims: “they will have a [firm] precedence of honor” – this is Muhammad’s promise of Heavenly rewards for belief, when the local Quraysh, who already believed in Allah, “knew” of only this one life, to be remembered by their relatives and children. This sudden change of doctrine from Muhammad’s own father, who was the priest for Allah, to Muhammad’s doctrine, is obviously false, as what god or stone idol changes himself, other than by mere humans, humans like Muhammad?

The Quraysh already believed in Allah. Not in YHWH/God or Jesus. Their pagan religion with name changes due to language changes extended back to Baal, the false god destroyed by Ezekial, and to Sin the cattle god of Mesopotamia, which also influenced Indian polytheism, and which Muhammad believed in as well, with his disguised worship of cattle in the Koran as shown earlier.

The Quraysh were right to call Muhammad a magician. Perhaps they meant ventriloquist, or maybe, deceiver, or liar. Muhammad with his nonsense contradicting his own father’s own doctrine shows he’s false, a liar, a deceiver, an improper inheritor of his father’s mantle as a priest of Allah. Thus the best replacement for this verse is: “”, the empty sentence.