Koran 6:46-49

6:46 Say, “Have you considered: if Allah should take away your hearing and your sight and set a seal upon your hearts, which deity other than Allah could bring them [back] to you?”

Look how we diversify the verses; then they [still] turn away.

47 Say, “Have you considered: if the punishment of Allah should come to you unexpectedly or manifestly, will any be destroyed but the wrongdoing people?”

48 And We send not the messengers except as bringers of good tidings and warners.

So whoever believes and reforms – there will be no fear concerning them, nor will they grieve.

49 But those who deny Our verses – the punishment will touch them for their defiant disobedience.

Koran 6:46-49

Muhammad Allah commands Muhammad to: “Say” or “Recite”. This means that this passage is addressed to Muhammad, not to all people. Thus, this passage can’t be in the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. As it is addressed to Muhammad, in his time and place, his context, this also means that this passage is locked to Muhammad’s context and can’t be in the context-free, perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah with all its perfect words. Thus, this passage is part of Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are incoherent and false, meaning Allah is incoherent, imaginary, fictional, and false.

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Muhammad commits shirk with: “We”, “Us” or “Our”, placing Allah as a companion to himself, showing that Allah is incoherent, imaginary, and fictional, and so Islam is incoherent with monotheism, thus Islam is contradictory and false.

Intumescent cataract of a 55-year-old male Imrankabirhossain [CC BY-SA 4.0]

Muhammad asks: “if Allah should take away your … sight… which deity other than Allah could bring them [back] to you?” According to Cataract, Wikipedia:

Cataract surgery was first described by the Indian physicianSuśruta (about 5th century BCE) in his manuscript Sushruta Samhita in ancient India. Most of the methods mentioned focus on hygiene. Follow-up treatments include bandaging of the eye and covering the eye with warm butter.

Cataract, Wikipedia

In other words, over 1000 years before Muhammad, an Indian physician was performing cataract surgery to relieve the symptoms. Today, cataract surgery is relatively routine and commonplace in the west. For more, see Mayo Clinic, Cataracts.

No Allah or Islam is needed to cure this form of blindness. Also note that this form of blindness doesn’t come from Allah either, thus showing that Allah is incoherent, false, fictional and imaginary, making Islamic doctrine and Islam false.

A woman rejoices at her newfound eyesight after an eye patch was removed following eye surgery to remove a cataract. See Wikimedia for more.

As one can see, when one’s medical technology cures the evil blindness of Allah, then this shows that Allah is evil, incoherent, imaginary, fictional and false.

Similarly, for hearing problems, it’s we humans that correct and cure deafness and hearing problems. Not Allah.

The phrase “set a seal upon your hearts” refers to the orders of the leader of the tribe of Muhammad telling his people to seal their hearts and not listen to and not obey Muhammad who was trying to usurp power over his tribe, by converting the naive and innocent into being followers of Muhammad, Muslims.

Muhammad claims: “Look how we diversify the verses”. Note the lack of capitalisation of “we” in the phrase. Let’s assume that it’s a minor problem in the translation and Muhammad Allah really meant “We” instead. Now look at how Tafsir Ibn Kathith, 6:40, really stretches it out with:

(See how variously We explain the Ayat,) and make them plain and clear, testifying to Allah’s Oneness in lordship and that those worshipped besides Him are all false and unworthy.

Tafsir Ibn Kathith, 6:40

So why didn’t Muhammad Allah explain it like the Tafsir? Amazing how the scholars of the tafsir knew better than Allah Muhammad to explain this verse. Who are the partners to Allah here? Obviously, Muhammad and above them both, are the scholars of the Tafsir.

The word “diversify” shows why the Koran is full of corrupt repetition and corrupt variation, Muhammad is reflecting his own divided personality, his “We”, instead of having one story reflecting the oneness of GOD as in the Torah and Bible.

Muhammad forgets to include himself: “48 And We send not the messengers except as bringers of good tidings and warners.”. Muhammad is one person in the “We”, but is not in the “messengers”. Here’s how pretend Allah could have written this better:

48 I, Allah send messengers, including Muhammad, as bringers of good tidings, messengers for their peoples, a warning to all peoples.

Pretend Allah

As you can see, this places Muhammad “correctly” as a messenger, and Allah above Muhammad, instead of beside Muhammad, which is shirk.

Muhammad commits shirk: “49 But those who deny Our verses”. The “Our” is Muhammad placing Allah beside himself. This shows that the best replacement for this passage is: “”, the empty sentence.

1 thought on “Koran 6:46-49”

Leave a comment