Koran 2:259

Or [consider such an example] as the one who passed by a township which had fallen into ruin.

He said, “How will Allah bring this to life after its death?”

So Allah caused him to die for a hundred years; then He revived him.

He said, “How long have you remained?”

The man said, “I have remained a day or part of a day.”

He said, “Rather, you have remained one hundred years. Look at your food and your drink; it has not changed with time. And look at your donkey; and We will make you a sign for the people. And look at the bones [of this donkey] – how We raise them and then We cover them with flesh.”

And when it became clear to him, he said, “I know that Allah is over all things competent.”

Koran 2:259

Muhammad spoke about Allah in the third person. This means this passage is not the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. Thus, Allah is false, imaginary, and fictional, which means Islamic doctrine and Islam are nonsensical and false.

Muhammad, in his Koran, addresses a sentence, verse, or passage to “Anonymous They”, with “they”, “them”, “he”, “your”, “the people”, and so on, without naming them. For more, read Anonymous They.

Muhammad includes the imperfect words of imperfect others, an interlocutor who is only in Muhammad’s mind, instead of the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an from perfect Allah. This means that Muhammad’s recitation, Muhammad’s Koran, is not from Allah, which means Allah, Muhammad, Islamic doctrine, Islam, and Koran are incoherent and false.

Who created this verse? Allah? No. Muhammad created this verse. How? What perfect god forgets the name of “the one”, “The man”? Thus this verse can’t be the perfect words of the perfect Qur’an of perfect Allah.

Note the food and drink didn’t change with time – thus Muhammad shows his ignorance. The drink would evaporate and the food would be eaten by animals and vermin, or decay and spoil over 100 years, leaving nothing left, except perhaps ruined containers.

Also, note that the man’s question remained unanswered by Allah. The ruins remained ruins, while Allah murdered the man and his donkey, and let them decay, rot and turn to dust for 100 years. That’s murder and animal abuse, two evil acts, showing Allah is evil. Notice that the man realised his question hadn’t been answered and lied to Allah and Allah didn’t realise that the man’s lie was a lie, showing Allah is foolish and stupid.

But there’s worse here. Note that Allah chats with this man, and is obviously apparent to this man. Thus Allah is within his own creation and looks like a man. Thus Allah is Muhammad. This is contrary to Islam and Islamic doctrine, thus revealing that Islam and Islamic doctrine are false.

Also notice the trivial nonsense in this badly retold story, that Allah is able to resurrect people, even a donkey in the story, yet is unable to raise Muhammad, Muslims, or even an insect in reality.

Thus you know this is Muhammad badly retelling a legend, showing his own incompetence, and revealing that Allah is impotent and imaginary. Thus the best replacement for this verse is: “”, the empty sentence.